Ananya Rajan
Brief · PM
The candidate is a Product Manager with two years of experience in logistics and carrier SaaS, preceded by nearly three years of hands-on carrier operations and supply chain planning at a national third-party logistics provider. The candidate ranked second overall due to top-tier scores in hands-on logistics operations experience and sole product ownership, demonstrated by managing over 600 monthly shipments for FMCG accounts and serving as the lone product manager driving route planning and carrier integration modules. The candidate's biggest gap against the rubric is in building from observed pain that peers broadly adopt, where past accomplishments primarily reflect localized reporting updates and dashboards rather than widespread, peer-adopted internal workflows.
Probe in interview
- Can you describe a specific instance where you observed an operational bottleneck among your operations peers, built a tool or workflow to solve it, and successfully got the team to adopt it as standard operating procedure?
- Can you share a specific example from your user discovery with frontline logistics operators where their day-to-day reality directly contradicted your initial product assumptions, and how that changed what you shipped?
- Can you provide a specific past example of a complex carrier exception you personally resolved on the ground, detailing the operational trade-offs you had to make that are difficult to account for in automated software?
PM rubric (applied role)89.0 / 100Shortlist
| Criterion | Score | Weight | Points | Evidence | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM-1 Hands-on logistics operations experience | 5/5 | 30% | 30 | Managed carrier planning and exception management for 4 FMCG client accounts across South India — 600+ shipments monthly | Candidate has over 2.5 years of hands-on carrier operations and supply chain planning experience at a national 3PL. |
| PM-2 Builds from observed pain; peers adopt it | 3/5 | 20% | 12 | Rebuilt the daily exception report format that the ops team sent to clients — reduced back-and-forth by removing ambiguity from the status descriptions | Shows one clear process rebuilt from observed pain adopted by the ops team, alongside tools built for individual use. |
| PM-3 Sole ownership with no layer in between | 5/5 | 20% | 20 | Sole PM for carrier integration and route planning modules — only PM in the company for the first 8 months | Sole product owner of core modules and sole company PM with direct commercial outcomes attributed to their work. |
| PM-4 Discovery directly with operators | 4/5 | 15% | 12 | Designed carrier rate benchmarking feature after 3 months of discovery with logistics managers at 8 companies; feature became the primary sales demo hook | Direct discovery with logistics managers led to a shipped feature that drove sales, complemented by weekly calls with carrier partners. |
| PM-5 Candour: kills, post-mortems, owning what went wrong | 5/5 | 15% | 15 | killed 2 — one after a week (data showed the behaviour we assumed didn't exist), one after a month (adoption was strong but the right customers weren't using it) | Explicitly names two killed features that they championed, candidly explaining the lessons learned from the data. |
SPM rubric (other role)80.0 / 100Shortlist
| Criterion | Score | Weight | Points | Evidence | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPM-1 Hands-on logistics operations experience | 5/5 | 25% | 25 | preceded by 3 years in supply chain planning and carrier operations at a national 3PL. Built operational instincts in logistics before moving into product. | Has nearly 3 years of hands-on logistics ops experience that visibly shaped subsequent product decisions. |
| SPM-2 Senior-most owner, no one above them in the function | 5/5 | 25% | 25 | Sole PM for carrier integration and route planning modules — only PM in the company for the first 8 months | Led product as the senior-most and only PM in the company, with product ownership and decisions attributed directly to them. |
| SPM-3 Turns fixes into standing practice | 3/5 | 20% | 12 | Rebuilt the daily exception report format that the ops team sent to clients — reduced back-and-forth by removing ambiguity from the status descriptions | Built an adopted reporting format and documentation, but lacks evidence of a named standing practice running independently without them. |
| SPM-4 Judgement under pressure, stated plainly | 5/5 | 15% | 15 | Shipped 5 features in 12 months; killed 2 — one after a week (data showed the behaviour we assumed didn't exist), one after a month (adoption was strong but the right customers weren't using it) | Clearly names hard calls and failures alongside plain rationale for killing championed features. |
| SPM-5 Grows people who then get promoted | 1/5 | 15% | 3 | none | The CV contains no evidence of mentoring, managing, or growing team members. |
Interview invite draft
draftRedacted CV (exactly what the model saw)
[REDACTED] Product Manager [REDACTED] · [REDACTED] · Chennai · [REDACTED] Professional Summary Product Manager with 2 years in product, preceded by 3 years in supply chain planning and carrier operations at a national 3PL. Built operational instincts in logistics before moving into product. Own things end to end. Ship and learn in short cycles. Have killed two features I championed after the data proved me wrong. Work Experience Product Manager Routemaster Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (Last-Mile & Carrier SaaS), Chennai · Apr 2023 – Present — Sole PM for carrier integration and route planning modules — only PM in the company for the first 8 months — Shipped 5 features in 12 months; killed 2 — one after a week (data showed the behaviour we assumed didn't exist), one after a month (adoption was strong but the right customers weren't using it) — Designed carrier rate benchmarking feature after 3 months of discovery with logistics managers at 8 companies; feature became the primary sales demo hook — Built product documentation from scratch; created the first user manual that didn't exist when I joined — Runs weekly calls with 5 carrier partners to understand operational constraints that affect the platform — product decisions informed by carrier ops reality, not assumptions Senior Supply Chain Analyst TCI Supply Chain Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Chennai · Sep 2021 – Mar 2023 — Managed carrier planning and exception management for 4 FMCG client accounts across South India — 600+ shipments monthly — Built a delivery SLA monitoring dashboard in Tableau; moved from reactive to proactive exception handling — reduced SLA breaches by 22% over 2 quarters — Renegotiated rates with 3 underperforming carriers using a performance data model I built; saved n18L annually on one account Supply Chain Analyst TCI Supply Chain Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Chennai · Jul 2020 – Aug 2021 — Demand forecasting, carrier scheduling, and delivery exception management for 2 manufacturing client accounts — Rebuilt the daily exception report format that the ops team sent to clients — reduced back-and-forth by removing ambiguity from the status descriptions Education B.E., Industrial Engineering · Anna University, Chennai · 2016–2020 · CGPA 8.4/10 Skills & Certifications Product strategy · Supply chain operations · JIRA · Figma · SQL · Tableau · Mixpanel · Notion · Excel APICS CSCP (2022) · Product Analytics – Amplitude (2024)